What is the difference between rail and light rail?

Monorail vs Light Rail

Both monorail and light rail are rapid transit systems allowing for faster and more efficient transport of people in big cities. There are many similarities in a monorail and a light rail, and someone who has seen and experience both of them (as in Sydney, Australia) can easily compare them, but for those who have only seen these modes of transport in picture, here is a quick comparison to find out differences between these futuristic modes of transport.

Monorail

As the name implies, this is a fast mode of transport that is different from other rail transport. It runs on a single rail in sharp contrast to conventional railway that runs on twin rails. Another factor that separates it from other modes of transport is that it needs an elevated track in the midst of the city and the rail runs without any hindrance or interruptions posed by city traffic. Monorail operates on electricity and is considered to be very expensive in comparison to traditional railway system. This is perhaps one reason it is restricted to only a few cities.

Monorail system called maglev (magnetic levitation) has been developed by German scientists and allows the train to run at unbelievably high speeds of 500kmph. Despite it being used in amusement parks as rides for children, monorail involves heavy infrastructure cost and this is why it is used only when other means of transport fail to serve the purpose.

Light rail

Light rail is a rapid transit system employed in may cities of the world. It is actually a rail made up of a number of cars joined together that move at fast speed around the city on the ground. They have lower capacity and also move at a slower speed than monorail. In many ways, light rail resembles the tram system used earlier in cities. It is advantageous for those who need to move short distances and also for those who need to stop at various points in a city. The very fact that it carries fewer passengers justifies its name as light rail. Light rail runs on 2 rails just like other rail systems.

What is the difference between Monorail and Light Rail?

• Monorail moves on a single rail while light rail moves on 2 rails like other transport systems

• The construction of monorail is more expensive than light rail

• Monorail moves at a much greater speed and is ideal for moving to large distances while light rail moves at slower speeds and stops at many stations. It is suitable for moving to various points inside a city

• Monorail moves on elevated track specially built while light rail is a number of cars joined together that move on the ground.

What is the difference between rail and light rail?

Central Link light rail in Seattle is mostly (iirc) underground and elevated, with most of the rest being in its own totally separated row on the ground. It has a max speed of 55 mph. And it’s built mostly (if not entirely) to proper heavy rail standards. The subway in New York has a max speed of 40 rn and was meant to be 55 before a train crash made them lower the speed for safety reasons. Like any metro I’ve ever heard of it’s built to heavy rail standards as well. So what, if anything, is the difference between a metro system like that of New York (or Toronto, or Montreal, or Paris, or any other city with a metro) and a light rail system like central link? Because they seem to be about the same, and I feel like it’s mainly a difference in name only so they can get people to vote for it without them thinking it’s a metro, which might make some people balk, thinking it’s super expensive and not necessary for a city Seattle’s size. The only difference I see between them is the trains themselves, with metros using rigid cars that look more like what people tend to think of as trains, whereas light rail uses lrvs with articulations in them. But what’s really the difference between a rigid train car and one that’s articulated other than turning radius and the articulations themselves if the cars are the same length? I mean link uses longer cars than the MTA, but some metros have cars that are nearly as long as link, if not longer (tho I think longer cars are mostly used on systems more like Bart that’re more interurban commuter rail)

Light rail or light rail transit (LRT) is a form of urban rail public transportation that generally has a lower capacity and lower speed than heavy rail and metro systems, but higher capacity and higher speed than traditional street-running tram systems. The term is typically used to refer to rail systems with rapid transit-style features that usually use electric rail cars operating mostly in private rights-of-way separated from other traffic but sometimes, if necessary, mixed with other traffic in city streets. If this is the case, then under the law of many countries such systems are then legally tramways, although the vehicles which run on them are sometimes designated “supertrams”. Modern light rail technology is flexible and adaptable, and whether any given system is considered a true rapid transit system or not depends on its characteristics.

 

What is the difference between rail and light rail?


Comparison to other rail transit modes

With its mix of right-of-way types and train control technologies, LRT offers the widest range of latitude of any rail system in the design, engineering, and operating practices. The challenge in designing light rail systems is to realize the potential of LRT to provide fast, comfortable service while avoiding the tendency to overdesign that results in excessive capital costs beyond what is necessary to meet the public’s needs.

Rapid rail transit
Light rail vehicles (LRVs) are distinguished from rapid rail transit (RRT) vehicles by their capability for operation in mixed traffic, generally resulting in a narrower car body and articulation in order to operate in a traffic street environment. With their large size, large turning radius, and often an electrified third rail, RRT vehicles cannot operate in the street. Since LRT systems can operate using existing streets, they often can avoid the cost of expensive subway and elevated segments that would be required with RRT.

Streetcars or trams
Conversely, LRVs generally outperform streetcars in terms of capacity and top end speed, and almost all modern LRVs are capable of multiple-unit operation. Particularly on exclusive rights-of-way, LRVs can provide much higher speeds and passenger volumes than a streetcar. Thus a single-unit streetcar capable of only 70 kilometres per hour (43 mph) operating on an shared right of way is not generally considered “light rail”. The latest generation of LRVs is considerably larger and faster, typically of length of 29 metres (95 ft) with maximum speed around 105 kilometres per hour (65 mph).

Heritage streetcar
A variation many cities consider is to use historic or replica cars on their streetcar systems instead of modern LRVs. A heritage streetcar may not have the capacity and speed of an LRV, but it will add to the ambiance and historic character of its location.

Light metro
A derivative of LRT is light rail rapid transit (LRRT), also referred to as Light Metro. Such railways are characterized by exclusive rights of way, advanced train control systems, short headway capability, and floor level boarding. These systems approach the passenger capacity of full metro systems, but can be cheaper to construct by using the ability of LRVs to turn tighter curves and climb steeper grades than standard RRT vehicles.

Interurbans
The term interurban (German Überland(strassen)bahn) is mainly used about rail-cars that run through the streets like ordinary streetcars (trams), but also between cities and/or towns, often through rural environments. In the period 1900-1930, interurbans were very common in the U.S., especially in the Midwest. Some of them, like the Red Devils, the J.G.Brill Bullets, and the Electroliners, belonged to this time’s high-speed railcars, with a commercial speed of up to about 145 km/h (90 mph).


Train operation

An important factor crucial to LRT is the train operator. Unlike rail rapid transit, traveling unattended with automatic train operation (ATO), the operator is a key element in a safe, high-quality LRT operation. The reason that the operator is so important is because the train tracks often run on roads with cars. If trains were automated on roads, a person wouldn’t be there to stop the train if a car pulled in front of it. Light rail trains are actually very heavy to prevent damage from impacts with cars. Thus, a train with ATO is not “light rail”. The philosophy of light rail is that a qualified person should be on each train to deal with emergencies, and while that person is there, he or she might as well operate the train.


Power sources

Overhead lines supply electricity to the vast majority of light rail systems. This avoids the danger of passengers stepping on an electrified third rail. The Docklands Light Railway uses an inverted third rail for its electrical power which allows the electrified rail to be covered and the power drawn from the underside. Trams in Bordeaux, France use a special third-rail configuration where the power is only switched on beneath the trams, making it safe on city streets. Several systems in Europe, as well as a few recently-opened systems in North America use diesel-powered trains.


Pros and cons of light rail

All transit service involves a trade-off between speed and frequency of stops. Services that stop frequently have lower overall speed and are therefore less attractive for longer trips but are more likely to go where the user wants. Light rail, monorail, and Bus Rapid Transit are all forms of rapid transit, which generally signifies high speed and widely-spaced stops. Trams are a form of local transit, making more frequent stops.


Costs of light rail construction and operation

The cost of light rail construction varies widely, largely depending on the amount of tunneling and elevated structures required. A survey of North American light rail projects shows that costs of most LRT systems range from $15 million per mile to over $100 million per mile. Seattle’s new light rail system is by far the most expensive in the U.S. at $179 million per mile, since it includes extensive tunneling in poor soil conditions, elevated sections, and stations as deep as 180 feet (55 m) below ground level. These result in costs more typical of subways or rapid transit systems than light rail. At the other end of the scale, four systems (Baltimore MD, Camden NJ, Sacramento CA, and Salt Lake City UT) incurred costs of less than $20 million per mile. Over the U.S. as a whole, excluding Seattle, new light rail construction costs average about $35 million per mile. By comparison, a freeway lane expansion typically costs $20 million per lane mile (a lane mile is a mile-long lane) for two directions. Since a light rail track can carry up to 20,000 people per hour as compared with 2,000-2,200 vehicles per hour for one freeway lane, light rail could theoretically deliver significantly more congestion-reduction potential per dollar as incremental freeway lanes in congested urban areas. For example, in Boston and San Francisco, light rail lines carry 9,600 and 13,100 passengers per hour, respectively, in the peak direction during rush hour.

Combining highway expansion with LRT construction can save costs by doing both highway improvements and rail construction at the same time. As an example, Denver’s T-REX (Transportation Expansion) project rebuilt interstate highways 25 and 225 and added a light-rail expansion for a total cost of $1.67 billion over five years. The cost of 17 miles (27 km) of highway improvements and 19 miles (31 km) of double-track light rail worked out to $19.3 million per highway lane-mile and $27.6 million per LRT track-mile. The project came in under budget and 22 months ahead of schedule.

LRT cost efficiency improves dramatically as ridership increases, as can be seen from the numbers above: the same rail line, with similar capital and operating costs, is far more efficient if it is carrying 20,000 people per hour than if it is carrying 2400. The Calgary, Alberta C-Train used many common light rail techniques to keep costs low, including minimizing underground and elevated trackage, sharing transit malls with buses, leasing rights-of-way from freight railroads, and combining LRT construction with freeway expansion. As a result, Calgary ranks toward the less expensive end of the scale with capital costs of around $24 million per mile.

However, Calgary’s LRT ridership is much higher than any comparable U.S. light rail system at 300,000 passengers per weekday, and as a result its efficiency of capital is also much higher. Its capital costs were ⅓ that of the San Diego Trolley, a comparably sized U.S. system built at the same time, while by 2009 its ridership was approximately three times as high. Thus, Calgary’s capital cost per passenger was much lower than that of San Diego. Its operating cost per passenger was also much lower because of its higher ridership. A typical C-Train vehicle costs only $163 per hour to operate, and since it averages 600 passengers per operating hour, Calgary Transit estimates that its LRT operating costs are only 27 cents per ride, versus $1.50 per ride on its buses.


Videos;

Why is it called light rail?

Light-rail transit (LRT) is rapid transit that operates electric-powered single cars or short trains on fixed rails. Light refers to lighter passenger capacity, not the physical weight of the vehicles.

What means light rail?

Light rail or light rail transit (LRT) is a form of urban rail public transportation that generally has a lower capacity and lower speed than heavy rail and metro systems, but higher capacity and higher speed than traditional street-running tram systems.

What's the difference between MRT and LRT?

MRT moves at a greater speed and has longer trains while LRT trains are smaller in length and move slowly because of numerous stoppages.

Is a subway light or heavy rail?

Heavy rail (also called metro rail, subway, rapid transit, or rapid rail) is an electric railway on devoted rights-of-way that handles many passengers at once.