Which of the following was the result of the Supreme Court decision in McCulloch v. Maryland?

“Although, among the enumerated powers of government, we do not find the word ‘bank’ or ‘incorporation,’ we find the great powers to lay and collect taxes; to borrow money; to regulate commerce; to declare and conduct a war; and to raise and support armies and navies . . . But it may with great reason be contended, that a government, entrusted with such ample powers . . . must also be entrusted with ample means for their execution. The power being given, it is the interest of the nation to facilitate its execution.”

This case explores the legal concepts of federalism, national supremacy, and the Necessary and Proper Clause.

The United States government created the first national bank for the country in 1791, but its charter lapsed under President Jefferson. During James Madison’s presidency, the Second Bank of the United States was chartered. The national bank was controversial due to competition with state banks, corruption, and the perception that the federal government was becoming too powerful. Maryland attempted to close the Baltimore branch of the national bank by passing a tax on all banks created outside of the state. James McCulloch, the bank’s manager, refused to pay the tax. The state of Maryland sued McCulloch saying that Maryland had the power to tax any business in its state and that the Constitution did not give Congress the power to create a national bank. McCulloch was convicted and fined, but he appealed the decision. The U.S. Supreme Court determined that Congress has implied powers that allow it to create a national bank, even though the Constitution does not explicitly state that power, and that Maryland’s taxing of its branches was unconstitutional because it interfered with the working of the federal government.

Annotation

Primary Holding

States cannot interfere with the federal government when it uses its implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause to further its express constitutional powers.

Facts

The U.S. Congress created the Second Bank of the United States in 1816. A year later, the Bank opened a banch in Baltimore, Maryland, where it carried out all the normal operations of a bank. Its legitimacy was based solely on the applicability of the U.S. Constitution to Maryland. In 1818, however, the Maryland legislature voted to impose a tax on all banks within the state that were not chartered by the legislature. The Second Bank of the United States refused to comply with the law, resulting in a lawsuit against its head, James William McCulloch. The state successfully argued on appeal to the state appellate court that the Second Bank was unconstitutional because the Consititution did not provide a textual commitment for the federal government to charter a bank.

Opinions

Majority

• John Marshall (Author)
• Bushrod Washington
• William Johnson, Jr.
• Henry Brockholst Livingston
• Thomas Todd
• Gabriel Duvall
• Joseph Story

In this unanimous decision, Marshall observed that the Second Bank was no different from the First Bank of the United States, of which the constitutionality had not been challenged. Echoing the decision in Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, he also noted that the people rather than the states were responsible for ratifying the U.S. Constitution and thus taking away a measure of sovereignty from the states. He did not find it necessary to establish a textual basis in the Constitution that specifically addressed banks.

The most notable section of Marshall's opinion concerned the Necessary and Proper Clause. He rejected the state's argument that this clause was confined to authorizing only laws that were absolutely essential to carrying out its enumerated powers. Marshall felt that a broader interpretation was warranted, since the clause was not placed among the limitations on Congressional authority and thus should be viewed as an expansion on its authority. As a result, he redefined the meaning of "necessary" as something closer to "appropriate and legitimate," covering all methods for furthering the objectives covered by the enumerated powers. Moreover, Marshall struck down the tax as applied to the Second Bank as unconstitutional.

Case Commentary

Later commentators have continued to challenge the logic in Marshall's opinion, some of them suggesting that it infringes on the Tenth Amendment. However, it remains valid to the current day, and his view that the federal government derives sovereignty from the people rather than the states has been widely accepted. The decision has been influential in nations that have similar legal systems, such as Australia.

What was the result of McCulloch v. Maryland quizlet?

What were the two outcomes of McCulloch v. Maryland?