So sánh gt 1030 vs gtx 750ti năm 2024
|
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Show
Pipelines / CUDA cores640384CUDA cores640no dataCore clock speed1020 MHz1228 MHzBoost clock speed1085 MHz1670 MHzNumber of transistors1,870 million1,800 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm14 nmPower consumption (TDP)60 Watt30 WattTexture fill rate43.4035.23Floating-point performance1,389 gflops1,127 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4Length5.7" (14.5 cm)145 mmHeight4.376" (11.1 cm)no dataWidth2-slot1-slotSupplementary power connectorsNoneNone MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GBMemory bus width128 Bit64 BitMemory clock speed5.4 GB/s6000 MHzMemory bandwidth86.4 GB/s48.06 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMIMulti monitor support4 displaysno dataHDMI++HDCP+no dataMaximum VGA resolution2048x1536no dataG-SYNC supportno data+Audio input for HDMIInternalno data TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. Blu Ray 3D+no data3D Gaming+no data3D Vision+no data3D Vision Live+no dataVR Readyno data+ API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)Shader Model5.16.4OpenGL4.64.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131CUDA+6.1 Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 1030 by 57% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 1030 by 57% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 1030 by 7% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 1030 by 14% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 1030 by 18% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 1030 by 42% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 1030 by 17% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 1030 by 9% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% GTX 750 Ti outperforms GT 1030 by 21% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GT 1030. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 183 Mh/s no data Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.51 Gh/s no data Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 2.3 Mh/s no data Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.25 kh/s 0.11 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 74.4 Sol/s no data Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD50 25 1440p30−35 21 4K14−16 9 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207716−18 15 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey21−24 +16.7% 18 −16.7% Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16 +150% 6−7 −150% Battlefield 530−35 +9.7% 31 −9.7% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare27−30 +17.4% 23 −17.4% Cyberpunk 207716−18 +45.5% 11 −45.5% Far Cry 524−27 +31.6% 19 −31.6% Far Cry New Dawn27−30 +17.4% 23 −17.4% Forza Horizon 435−40 +29.6% 27 −29.6% Hitman 324−27 +18.2% 22 −18.2% Horizon Zero Dawn20−22 +33.3% 15 −33.3% Red Dead Redemption 216−18 +41.7% 12−14 −41.7% Shadow of the Tomb Raider21−24 +29.4% 17 −29.4% Watch Dogs: Legion18−20 +38.5% 13 −38.5% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey21−24 +75% 12 −75% Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16 +150% 6−7 −150% Battlefield 530−35 +30.8% 26 −30.8% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare27−30 +42.1% 18−20 −42.1% Cyberpunk 207716−18 +129% 7 −129% Far Cry 524−27 +47.1% 17 −47.1% Far Cry New Dawn27−30 +22.7% 22 −22.7% Forza Horizon 435−40 +45.8% 24 −45.8% Hitman 324−27 +62.5% 16 −62.5% Horizon Zero Dawn20−22 +66.7% 12 −66.7% Metro Exodus14−16 +114% 7 −114% Red Dead Redemption 216−18 +41.7% 12−14 −41.7% Shadow of the Tomb Raider21−24 +83.3% 12 −83.3% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt21−24 +0% 21 +0% Watch Dogs: Legion18−20 +50% 12 −50% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey21−24 +200% 7 −200% Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16 +150% 6−7 −150% Battlefield 530−35 +70% 20 −70% Cyberpunk 207716−18 +60% 10−11 −60% Far Cry 524−27 +66.7% 15 −66.7% Far Cry New Dawn27−30 +50% 18 −50% Forza Horizon 435−40 +119% 16 −119% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt21−24 +75% 12 −75% Watch Dogs: Legion18−20 +200% 6 −200% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare14−16 +50% 10−11 −50% Hitman 316−18 +60% 10−11 −60% Horizon Zero Dawn16−18 +33.3% 12−14 −33.3% Metro Exodus9−10 +80% 5−6 −80% Red Dead Redemption 27−8 +75% 4−5 −75% Shadow of the Tomb Raider12−14 +44.4% 9−10 −44.4% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey9−10 +125% 4−5 −125% Assassin's Creed Valhalla5−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Battlefield 516−18 +240% 5−6 −240% Cyberpunk 20775−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Far Cry 516−18 +60% 10−11 −60% Far Cry New Dawn16−18 +113% 8−9 −113% Forza Horizon 418−20 +72.7% 10−12 −72.7% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt10−12 +120% 5−6 −120% Watch Dogs: Legion5−6 +150% 2−3 −150% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare7−8 +75% 4−5 −75% Hitman 39−10 +50% 6−7 −50% Horizon Zero Dawn9−10 +12.5% 8−9 −12.5% Metro Exodus4−5 +300% 1−2 −300% Red Dead Redemption 25−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Shadow of the Tomb Raider5−6 +150% 2 −150% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt8−9 +167% 3−4 −167% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey5−6 +400% 1 −400% Assassin's Creed Valhalla4−5 +100% 2−3 −100% Battlefield 58−9 +700% 1 −700% Cyberpunk 20771−2 0−1 Far Cry 58−9 +33.3% 6−7 −33.3% Far Cry New Dawn10−12 +37.5% 8−9 −37.5% Forza Horizon 412−14 +85.7% 7 −85.7% Watch Dogs: Legion3−4 +200% 1−2 −200% This is how GTX 750 Ti and GT 1030 compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 10.05 6.39 Recency 18 February 2014 17 May 2017 Cost $149 $79 Memory bus width 128 64 Pipelines / CUDA cores 640 384 Memory bandwidth 86.4 48.06 Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 30 Watt The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 1030 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 750 Ti GeForce GT 1030 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
