Chúng tôi so sánh hai GPU Thị trường chuyên nghiệp: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 và 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 để xem GPU nào có hiệu suất tốt hơn trong các thông số kỹ thuật chính, kiểm tra đánh giá, tiêu thụ điện năng, v.v.
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores1792576Core clock speed1202 MHz667 MHzBoost clock speed1480 MHzno dataNumber of transistors7,200 million2,540 millionManufacturing process technology16 nm28 nmPower consumption [TDP]100 Watt55 WattTexture fill rate165.832.02Floating-point performance5,304 gflops768.4 gflops
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro P4000 and Quadro K2100M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus [motherboard compatibility], additional power connectors [power supply compatibility]. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop sizeno datamedium sizedInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A [3.0]Length241 mmno dataWidth1-slotno dataSupplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GBMemory bus width256 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed7604 MHz3000 MHzMemory bandwidth192 GB/s48.0 GB/sShared memory--
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones [so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips]. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputsDisplay Port1.41.2
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus++3D Vision Prono data+3D Stereo+no dataMosaic++nView Display Management++Optimus++
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX1212Shader Model5.15OpenGL4.54.5OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan++CUDA6.1+
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
P4000 outperforms K2100M by 756% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 [the last being done in 4K resolution if possible], and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
P4000 outperforms K2100M by 757% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
P4000 outperforms K2100M by 750% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
P4000 outperforms K2100M by 879% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
Quadro P4000 38590
+1174%
P4000 outperforms K2100M by 1174% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.
Octane Render OctaneBench
This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
P4000 outperforms K2100M by 827% in Octane Render OctaneBench.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro P4000 and Quadro K2100M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC [SHA256] no data 38 Mh/s Monero / XMR [CryptoNight] 0.45 kh/s no data
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Performance in popular games
Full HD Low Preset
Cyberpunk 207750−55 6−7
Full HD Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey55−60
+850%
6−7
−850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
Battlefield 590−95
+944%
9−10
−944%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare80−85
+523%
12−14
−523%
Cyberpunk 207750−55
+750%
6−7
−750%
Far Cry 575−80
+1217%
6−7
−1217%
Far Cry New Dawn75−80
+1183%
6−7
−1183%
Forza Horizon 495−100
+782%
10−12
−782%
Hitman 390−95
+1229%
7−8
−1229%
Horizon Zero Dawn65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Red Dead Redemption 245−50
+600%
7−8
−600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider65−70
+590%
10−11
−590%
Watch Dogs: Legion55−60
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
Full HD High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey55−60
+850%
6−7
−850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
Battlefield 590−95
+944%
9−10
−944%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare80−85
+523%
12−14
−523%
Cyberpunk 207750−55
+750%
6−7
−750%
Far Cry 575−80
+1217%
6−7
−1217%
Far Cry New Dawn75−80
+1183%
6−7
−1183%
Forza Horizon 495−100
+782%
10−12
−782%
Hitman 390−95
+1229%
7−8
−1229%
Horizon Zero Dawn65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Metro Exodus50−55
+940%
5−6
−940%
Red Dead Redemption 245−50
+600%
7−8
−600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider65−70
+590%
10−11
−590%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt77
+756%
9
−756%
Watch Dogs: Legion55−60
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
Full HD Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey55−60
+850%
6−7
−850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
Battlefield 590−95
+944%
9−10
−944%
Cyberpunk 207750−55
+750%
6−7
−750%
Far Cry 575−80
+1217%
6−7
−1217%
Far Cry New Dawn75−80
+1183%
6−7
−1183%
Forza Horizon 495−100
+782%
10−12
−782%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt41
+413%
8−9
−413%
Watch Dogs: Legion55−60
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
1440p High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare45−50
+700%
6−7
−700%
Hitman 350−55
+643%
7−8
−643%
Horizon Zero Dawn40−45
+356%
9−10
−356%
Metro Exodus30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Red Dead Redemption 221−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider40−45
+600%
6−7
−600%
1440p Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey30−35 0−1 Assassin's Creed Valhalla30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Battlefield 565−70
+843%
7−8
−843%
Cyberpunk 207721−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Far Cry 550−55
+980%
5−6
−980%
Far Cry New Dawn55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Forza Horizon 460−65
+1475%
4−5
−1475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Watch Dogs: Legion24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
4K High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Hitman 327−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Horizon Zero Dawn21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Metro Exodus20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 216−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%
4K Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey20−22 0−1 Assassin's Creed Valhalla18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Battlefield 535−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Cyberpunk 20778−9 0−1 Far Cry 527−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Far Cry New Dawn30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Forza Horizon 440−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Watch Dogs: Legion14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
This is how Quadro P4000 and K2100M compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- Quadro P4000 is 183% faster than K2100M
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4000 is 5700% faster than the K2100M.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Quadro P4000 surpassed K2100M in all 53 of our tests.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score 30.04 3.51 Recency 6 February 2017 23 July 2013 Cost $815 $84.95 Memory bus width 256 128 Pipelines / CUDA cores 1792 576 Memory bandwidth 192 48 Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm Power consumption [TDP] 100 Watt 55 Watt
The Quadro P4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2100M in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro P4000 is a workstation card while Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your own vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.
Quadro P4000
Quadro K2100M
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User ratings: view and submit
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:
Rate NVIDIA Quadro K2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.