Routine serum protein electrophoresis with normal proteins results in five zones or bands.

Introduction

Serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) is an important tool used clinically to separate serum proteins into five major bands—albumin, alpha-1, alpha-2, beta, and gamma1,2,3,4. Electrophoretic separation of serum proteins was first demonstrated in the early 1900s by Tiselius using a U-shaped electrophoretic cell5. This combination of moving boundary electrophoresis coupled with optical detection, marked the first separation of serum proteins into distinct protein bands5. Since these early studies, electrophoretic separations using cellulose acetate or more commonly agarose gels rapidly evolved and became the gold standard for SPE measurements6. Unlike the moving boundary experiments, the gels provided a stable matrix to immobilize and stain the protein bands following separation, enabling quantification using densitometry. More recently, capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) has emerged as an attractive alternative for SPE given its advantages in throughput and automation7,8,9.

Protein separation with CZE first began appearing in the mid-1980s, with the first commercial instrument dedicated to clinical SPE measurements introduced in the late 1990s10,11. SPE with CZE is normally performed in buffers with high pH and ionic strengths to negatively charge the proteins and reduce their interactions with the capillary walls11. Protein adsorption to the capillary wall is a common problem that can substantially degrade separation performance12. Other commonly used approaches to reduce protein adsorption involve dynamic coatings added into the background electrolyte (BGE) or chemical modifications of the capillary wall13,14,15,16,17. Once separated, proteins are detected directly using UV absorption. Since labeling steps are not required, this approach is convenient, but also restricts the choice of buffers to those that are transparent in the UV spectral region.

Beyond the advantages of throughput and automation, CZE also has better separation efficiency and repeatability compared with agarose gel SPE18,19. The C3 and transferrin peaks in the beta region are better resolved in CZE and there is improved quantification of the pre albumin portion of the SPE20. The gamma and beta bands migrate first in CZE causing them to narrow while the alpha and albumin bands are broader compared with agarose gel electrophoresis3. Sensitivity is also slightly better with CZE compared to agarose gel, while specificity seems somewhat lower although the differences are small19. The protein staining required for agarose gel SPE can vary with protein concentration and lead to unwanted background staining of the support media21. There can also be challenges associated with non-uniform and non-linear dye binding, which can complicate and degrade quantification with the densitometry measurements in gel SPE6. CZE, on the other hand, predominantly uses direct detection of proteins using UV absorbance at 214 nm. This eliminates the time and complications arising from protein staining but can lower specificity since all species absorbing in the UV will contribute to the SPE profile. The presence of antibiotics, for instance, has been shown to lead to unwanted contributions to the SPE signal22.

SPE profiles, measured with gel or CZE, can alert clinicians to a spectrum of disorders since trauma or disease often upsets the balance of serum proteins23. Decreased levels of albumin, for example, can be indicative of a hereditary deficiency (hypoalbuminemia) or disease states like nephrotic syndrome24. Likewise, primary amyloidosis and immune deficiencies reduce the levels observed in the gamma region2. The most prevalent use of SPE, however, is in the detection and diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies, such as multiple myeloma1,2,25. These disorders arise from the proliferation of a single B-cell clone, leading to the excess production of a monoclonal immunoglobulin1,26. Since immunoglobins migrate largely in the gamma band, monoclonal gammopathies result in a characteristic spike in the gamma region of the SPE1,2. An unusual profile in the SPE triggers a series of more specific immunoassays to quantify important antigens and confirm a diagnosis2. Clinically, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) remain the most popular format for immunoassays. However, a large body of work has shown that CZE is also suitable for immunoassay measurements using a myriad of approaches27,28,29. This opens intriguing possibilities for combing both SPE and immunoassays measurements using one CZE platform.

Antigen–antibody complexes initially at equilibrium can be separated from unbound species in CZE, as long as the electrophoretic mobilities of the species are sufficiently different and the separation time is competitive with the equilibrium kinetics30. Affinity-based CZE techniques have been thoroughly discussed in the literature and identified as affinity probe capillary electrophoresis (APCE) and more recently as non-equilibrium capillary electrophoresis in equilibrium mixtures (NECEEM)30,31,32,33,34,35. NECEEM, in particular, has advantages since it does not require an equilibrium to be established inside the capillary36. Unlike other approaches, it does not require antibody or antigen in the BGE and separations are carried out on pre-equilibrated samples using conventional injection and separartion conditions, making simultaneous serum protein analyisis and immunoassays possible. CZE analysis of pre-equilibrated solutions were first used to analyze human growth hormone, where bound and unbound species were successfully separated and quantified using UV detection37,38. The integration of fluorescence labeling methods increased specificity and substantially improved detection limits, expanding the reach of the technique27. Finally, methods using either labeled antigen or antibody have been developed along with strategies for multiplexed detection33,39,40.

APCE, NECEEM, and related CZE based immunoassays are homogenous assays, which has advantages over more traditional techniques like ELISA, where surface immobilization degrades antibody performance. CZE methods also require very little sample and have enhanced specificity due to the separation step. The latter also improves the workflow since CZE based immunoassays do not require the multiple fluid exchanges and rinsing steps required in traditional immunoassays. Finally, in addition to quantifying analyte concentration, CZE measurements can yield fundamental parameters like Kd and rate constants41,42. This has led to a number of CZE based assays for drug binding32,43,44,45,46,47,48,49, hormone analysis50,51,52,53, virion analysis54,55,56,57, along with other applications58.

The total analysis time is an important consideration when using APCE or NECEEM with preincubated samples, since the antigen–antibody complex continually dissociates during the non-equilibrium separation58. Shortening the length-to-detector, elevating the separation field, and increasing the electroosmotic flow (EOF) are all strategies that have been used to decrease analysis times59. These approaches have been successful in performing separations in under a minute, which is sufficient for preventing significant dissociation of most immunocomplexes27.

Combining SPE and immunoassay measurements on one separation platform can consolidate assays and streamline workflow. For instance, once a M-spike is observed and multiple myeloma is suspected, a series of immunosubtraction and immunoassay measurements are normally carried out to isotype the monoclonal antibody, confirm the diagnosis, and stratify risk. Isotyping the antibody using immunosubtraction requires a series of SPE measurements in CZE. Each SPE run provides an opportunity to measure free light chains and other important biomarkers such as β2 microglobulin simultaneously. This work discusses the development of a high-speed capillary electrophoresis (HSCE) platform capable of simultaneous SPE and immunoassay measurements.

Results and discussion

The dual detection HSCE is shown schematically in Fig. 1. The laser source is focused into the detection zone of the separation capillary and the back-scattered radiation is detected on a segmented photodiode detector. For the experiments described here, the 488 nm line of an argon-krypton laser is used for excitation. As shown previously, the interference pattern in the backscattered radiation responds to changes in refractive index (RI) as analytes pass through the detection zone60,61. Shifts in the interference pattern are measured as intensity changes on the split photodiode. The differential signal from the two elements is amplified and recorded as the BSI signal. Since RI is a universal detection signal, proteins and other species in the serum sample will all contribute to changes in the BSI signal.

Figure 1

source to generate the BSI and fluorescence signals. Excitation light is focused into the detection zone of the capillary and reflected back to form the BSI fringe pattern. A beam splitter reflects the fringe pattern towards a split photodiode detector aligned on two of the fringes. The differential output is amplified and recorded as the BSI signal. Fluorescence excited by the same excitation source is collected from below the capillary with an objective, filtered, and detected with an APD. Both signals are recorded simultaneously.

Schematic of the dual detection HSCE platform using a single laser excitation

Full size image

Figure 2 shows representative SPE profiles measured using BSI in the HSCE platform. Three different buffer systems are compared, all with a pH above typical protein pI values to negatively charge the proteins and reduce interactions with the capillary wall62,63. In normal polarity mode, the negatively charged proteins electrophoretically migrate towards the anode but are swept towards the cathode and past the detection zone by the electro-osmotic flow (EOF). The migration time, therefore, reflects the difference between these two processes20.

Figure 2

Serum protein electropherograms (SPE) measured in various buffers using HSCE combined with BSI detection. Human serum samples separated in (A) 100 mM boric acid at pH 10 (400 V/cm), (B) 100 mM arginine at pH 11 (500 V/cm), and (C) 20 mM CHES at pH 10 (500 V/cm). Each SPE contains six major protein bands as identified and were separated in normal polarity, where the proteins migrate following the EOF, which is the large spike identified at short times in each electropherogram. The large peak due to albumin saturates the signal in each electropherogram.

Full size image

Figure 2A shows the SPE electropherogram measured in 100 mM boric acid at pH 10. Given its transparency in the UV spectral region, this is traditionally the most utilized buffer system for SPE measurements with CZE20. The serum sample (10 mg/mL) was hydrodynamically injected (65 kPa, 150 ms) into the HSCE capillary and separated at a field strength of 400 V/cm. As shown in Fig. 2A, all five major protein bands are identified in the electropherogram. Even with the ultra-thin wall capillary that efficiently dissipates heat, we observe the onset of Joule heating at field strengths above 400 V/cm using 100 mM boric acid. Since high field strengths are required for the rapid separations desirable for immunoassays, low conductivity buffer systems were explored.

Figure 2B, C show SPE electropherograms measured in BGE of 100 mM arginine at pH 11 and 20 mM N-cyclohexyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid (CHES) at pH 10. The zwitterionic nature of these buffers reduces the conductivity of the BGE, enabling higher separation fields (500 V/cm) without Joule heating. As shown in Fig. 2, the migration time for the last SPE peak (albumin) in both optimized buffers is reduced from 96 s in boric acid to under 79 s in the zwitterionic BGEs at the higher field strength. All five major protein bands are resolved in both arginine and CHES and, importantly, the gamma globulin band in which immunoglobulins migrate is shifted farther from the EOF band compared with comparable measurements in boric acid. Since all five major protein bands are resolved in the electropherograms shown in Fig. 2, all three optimized buffer systems were deemed suitable for SPE with HSCE.

To implement simultaneous immunoassay measurements, a second detection channel based on fluorescence is introduced. As shown schematically in Fig. 1, the same excitation beam used to generate the BSI signal excites fluorescence in the detection zone of the capillary. The fluorescence is collected from below using an objective, filtered to remove residual excitation light, and imaged onto a single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) detector. Since both the BSI and fluorescence signals are derived from the same excitation source, both signals arise from the same detection volume in the capillary and provide synchronized and orthogonal signals of sample properties.

To validate and optimize simultaneous SPE and immunoassays measurements, a monoclonal antibody specific for the fluorescent dye fluorescein was utilized. As discussed, there have been many methods developed for combining immunoassays with separations27,28,29. To maintain the SPE signal, however, approaches like NECEEM that begin with pre-equilibrated samples are the most straightforward to implement30,31,32,33,34,35. The three buffer systems optimized for SPE in Fig. 2, therefore, were tested for their ability to support successful immunoassays. To be successful, the bound and unbound species must be sufficiently separated and the total analysis time should be competitive with the immunocomplex dissociation kinetics31. To test the suitability of the BGEs, initial experiments used serum samples (7 mg/mL) pre-incubated for 30 min with 38 nM fluorescein and excess monoclonal antibody (334 nM).

Figure 3 shows fluorescence electropherograms for pre-incubated serum samples in the three buffer systems previously optimized for SPE – 100 mM arginine (Fig. 3A), 100 mM boric acid (Fig. 3B), and 20 mM CHES (Fig. 3C). The electropherogram in Fig. 3A shows that the immunocomplex and free antigen are poorly separated in the 100 mM arginine at pH 11, making this BGE unsuitable.

Figure 3

HSCE fluorescence electropherograms for serum samples incubated with 334 nM anti-fluorescein antibody and 38 nM fluorescein antigen. The mixtures were separated in background electrolytes of (A) 100 mM arginine at pH 11 (500 V/cm), (B) 100 mM boric acid at pH 10 (400 V/cm), and (C) 20 mM CHES at pH 10 (500 V/cm). Poor separation and low population of the immunocomplex make boric acid and arginine, respectively, unsuitable for this immunoassay. The electropherogram in CHES, on the other hand, shows a strong immunocomplex peak, making it suitable for the immunoassay.

Full size image

The electropherogram in Fig. 3B, on the other hand, shows that the immunocomplex and free antigen are fully separated in boric acid at pH 10, but little complex remains following the separation. This suggests that significant dissociation of the immunocomplex has taken place during the separation, making this BGE problematic. Finally, the electropherogram in Fig. 3C measured in CHES at pH 10, shows a strong peak for the immunocomplex making this BGE appropriate for immunoassays. The broad background trailing the peak is often referred to as the bridge region and arises from the continuous dissociation of antigen from the complex during the non-equilibrium separation30,31,32,33,34,35. As the antigen dissociates, its higher mobility opposes the EOF, which eventually sweeps it past the detection zone. Finally the additional peaks are observed in Fig. 3B, C, which are also present in control serum samples, are assigned to sample autofluorescence. As shown later, the most prominent peak near 79 s aligns with the albumin peak in the SPE.

To illustrate the dual SPE and immunoassay capabilities, Fig. 4 shows the simultaneously measured BSI and fluorescence electropherograms for three different antibody levels. For these experiments, the fluorescein antigen was added to the 7 mg/mL serum samples to a final concentration of 38 nM. The serum samples were then incubated with 0 nM, 200 nM, and 334 nM of the anti-fluorescein antibody and separated to yield the electropherograms shown in Fig. 4A, B, C, respectively.

Figure 4

(A) Simultaneous SPE (BSI signal inverted for clarity) and fluorescence electropherograms for serum samples (7 mg/mL) separated in 20 mM CHES at pH 10 (500 V/cm). Peaks observed in the fluorescence signal arise from autofluorescence from the serum samples. Panels B through D show serum samples spiked with 38 nM fluorescein and incubated with (B) 0 nM, (C) 200 nM, and (D) 334 nM of the anti-fluorescein antibody. With no antibody present, the fluorescence electropherogram contains one peak for the free antigen. As the concentration of antibody increases, a peak associated with the complex increases and the free antigen peak decreases. The bridging region connecting the two peaks arises from the continual dissociation of complex during the non-equilibrium separation process, as discussed previously. The first peak following the EOF in the BSI electropherogram is due to a system peak.

Full size image

The fluorescence electropherograms in Fig. 4 show that increasing levels of the antibody leads to increasing levels of the bound complex and decreasing levels of the free antigen as expected. As is most easily seen in Fig. 4B, there is a bridging region between the bound and unbound peaks due to the dissociation of the bound complex during the separation process. This leads to the continuous generation of free antigens during the separation as previously discussed. The presence of bound and unbound species, along with the bridge region shows that the separation time is competitive with the equilibrium kinetics. Although beyond the scope of the current study, previous studies have shown that kinetic parameters can be extracted from the bridge feature35. Comparison of both signals in Fig. 4 confirms that the immunocomplex migrates with the gamma globulin region in the BSI signal as expected. A comparison of both electropherograms also confirms that the autofluorescence peak observed near 60 s, corresponds with the large albumin peak seen in the BSI signal, as previously discussed.

To better characterize antigen binding, Fig. 5 shows a series of fluorescence electropherograms measured as a function of antibody level. As before, 7 mg/mL serum samples spiked with 38 nM fluorescein antigen were pre-incubated with the indicated levels of antibody. The electropherograms reveal an increase in the immunocomplex peak and decrease in free antigen peak with increasing antibody concentrations.

Figure 5

Fluorescence electropherograms for serum samples (7 mg/mL) spiked with 38 nM fluorescein and incubated with the indicated concentration of anti-fluorescein antibody. As before, the separation was carried out in 20 mM CHES at pH 10, using a field strength of 500 V/cm. The shift in the electropherograms arises from drift in the EOF.

Full size image

Integrating the areas under the peaks due to the bound complex leads to the calibration plot shown in Fig. 6. Peak areas were calculated following previous reports, resulting in excellent linearity over the limited antibody range studied34. From the calibration plot in Fig. 6, a 23 nM limit of detection (LOD) and 70 nM limit of quantification (LOQ) were calculated using the standard deviation of the response divided by the slope, multiplied by 3.3 and 10, respectively. For larger antibody ranges, the resulting non-linear curves can still provide quantitative results as previously reported27,40,41,45,59.

Figure 6

Calibration plot constructed using the electropherograms shown in Fig. 5. Peak area of the complex peak was calculated following the procedure described in ref34.

Full size image

Protein separation with CZE is often complicated by protein adsorption to the capillary walls, leading to band broadening, low separation efficiency, and poor repeatability64,65,66. This is often mitigated through the use of dynamic coatings added to the buffer67,68, chemical modification of the capillary surface63,69,70, or screening the interactions using high ionic strength buffers at elevated pH. For the HSCE approach, the pH of the buffer, along with the reduced capillary length and rapid migration through the capillary all contribute to lower protein adsorption at the capillary walls71. This is illustrated by the repeated injection and separation shown in Fig. 7, for a serum sample pre-incubated with 38 nM fluorescein and 200 nM of the anti-fluorescein antibody. While there are indications for reversible protein adsorption, the return of both signals to baseline levels and small variation in EOF (RSD = 2.26%) suggests that irreversible protein absorption is minimal72,73.

Figure 7

Repeated injections of a 7 mg/mL serum sample incubated with 38 nM fluorescein and 200 nM anti-fluorescein antibody. The separation was carried out in 20 mM CHES at pH 10 at a field strength of 500 V/cm.

Full size image

The elevated pH used to ensure that all the proteins are charged can also degrade immunoassays by reducing the antigen–antibody affinity. To explore the magnitude of this effect, preliminary HSCE separations in barbital BGE at pH 8 were conducted. Barbital is rarely used in CZE given its absorption in the UV, but it is compatible with the BSI signal used here. Figure 8 shows the simultaneously measured BSI and fluorescence electropherograms for serum incubated with fluorescein and the anti-fluorescein antibody. The SPE profile measured in the BSI signal shows a large peak due to albumin and a smaller peak due to transferrin. The other protein bands are not well-resolved making this particular BGE formulation unsuitable for SPE. The immunoassay measured in the fluorescence electropherogram, however, shows well separated peaks for the free antigen and complex. The lack of a bridging region between the two peaks suggest that the complex is more stable at the lower pH, with little dissociation taking place on the timescale of the separation. This improves immunoassay quantification and may provide better dual diagnostics, once conditions are found that optimize the SPE.

Figure 8

Simultaneous SPE (BSI signal inverted for clarity) and fluorescence electropherograms for serum samples (7 mg/mL) spiked with fluorescein and anti-fluorescein, separated in 50 mM barbital buffer at pH 8 (500 V/cm). The serum samples were spiked with 38 nM fluorescein and incubated with (A) 134 nM, (B) 167 nM, (C) 200 nM, (D) 267 nM, and (E) 334 nM of the anti-fluorescein antibody.

Full size image

The combination of completely universal BSI detection with a highly specific fluorescence signal provides two complimentary measures of sample properties, each with diagnostic value. The rapid analysis times of HSCE improves the throughput for clinical applications and enables immunoassay measurements of antigen–antibody complexes before significant dissociation takes place. Conditions are shown that provide characteristic SPE profiles and enable immunoassay quantification, simultaneously. At high pH, where the antigen–antibody affinity is reduced and the complex is less stable, the fluorescence electropherogram exhibits a significant bridge region connecting the complex and free antigen peaks in the electropherogram. This region arises from the continuous dissociation of antigen from the complex and is essentially eliminated at lower pH, where the complex is more stable. Measurements done at pH 8 reveal fluorescence electropherograms with well-defined, baseline separated peaks for the complex and free antigen. This potentially improves immunoassay performance but degrades the SPE separation where the characteristic profile is not recovered in the BSI electropherogram. Further exploration of separation conditions best suited for both SPE and immunoassays, will potentially lead to new, rapid methods for diagnostics using dual detection HSCE.

Conclusions

Refractive index detection using BSI is combined with fluorescence measurements to develop an HSCE platform capable of simultaneous SPE and immunoassay quantification. The HSCE platform uses an ultra-thin wall separation capillary to reduce Joule heating and a short length to promote rapid separation. SPE profiles in boric acid, arginine, and CHES buffers were measured with BSI and showed the characteristic five major protein bands expected for SPE. For the immunoassay, fluorescein and its antifluorescein monoclonal antibody were used as the test system. For the buffers found appropriate for SPE, only CHES enabled sufficient quantification of the immunocomplex. With fluorescein held constant in the serum sample, incubation with increasing levels of antibody resulted in growth of the immunocomplex peak and associated decreases in the free antigen peak in the fluorescence electropherograms. Comparison with the simultaneous SPE shows that the immunocomplex migrates in the gamma region as expected and calibration plots resulted in a LOD of 23 nM and LOQ of 70 nM for these preliminary studies. Both the BSI and fluorescence signals return to baseline levels after repeated sample injections, suggesting protein adsorption to the capillary walls is minimal. Finally, preliminary immunoassays carried out in a buffer at pH 8 leads to increased stability of the immunocomplex and improved separation of the complex and free antigen. While further experiments are needed to improve the SPE separation, these conditions lead to fluorescence electropherograms that lack the bridge region and are easily quantified.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Analytical grade N-cyclohexyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid (CHES), L-arginine, boric acid, sodium hydroxide, barbital buffer and fluorescein were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri). Mouse anti-fluorescein monoclonal antibody was obtained from Millipore Corporation (Temecula, CA) and lyophilized powder of human serum was purchased from Thermo Fisher (Fair Lawn, New Jersey). All the chemicals were used without further purification.

Boric acid buffer (100 mM, pH 10), arginine buffer (100 mM, pH 11), CHES buffer (20 mM, pH 10) and barbital buffer (50 mM pH 8) were prepared in ultrapure water and their pH adjusted using 1 M sodium hydroxide solution. All the solutions were stored at 4 °C and allowed to equilibrate at room temperature before use. A stock solution of serum was prepared in ultrapure water at a concentration of 20 mg/mL and diluted to the appropriate final concentration. Sample mixtures were prepared by combining appropriate volumes of stock solutions of serum, fluorescein, and the anti-fluorescein antibody together and diluting to the desired concentrations using ultra-pure water.

Experimental apparatus

The custom-designed HSCE is similar to that recently described74. The separation takes place in a 10 cm long total length fused silica capillary (50 μm i.d., 80 μm o.d.; VitroCom, Mountain Lakes, NJ) with a 8 cm length-to-detector. The capillary is mounted flush on the top of a copper baseplate which has a thermoelectric Peltier cooler (TEC1-12710) mounted to the underside. With the exception of small regions around the detection zone and ends of the capillary, the length of the capillary is covered with thermal paste to make good thermal contact with the underlying copper baseplate. A temperature controller (Stanford Research Systems LDC 501, Sunnyvale, CA) monitors the baseplate temperature and adjusts the Peltier cooler to maintain the temperature at the desired value with ± 0.004 °C.

An o-ring enclosure seals the outlet of the capillary for applying an under pressure. This is used for conditioning the capillary and hydrodynamic sample injections. The inlet side of the capillary overhangs the copper baseplate and extends into the meniscus of solutions held in open centrifuge tubes. The tubes are held in a computer controlled rotary stage that can quickly position the appropriate solution at the capillary inlet to exchange solutions or load samples into the capillary. Platinum electrodes for the separation voltage are positioned near the inlet and outlets of the capillary and extend into the solution resevoirs.

The HSCE is supported on a Zeiss Axiovert 100 TV inverted fluorescence microscope. For the BSI signal, the 488 nm line from an argon-krypton laser (Coherent, Innova 70, Santa Clara, CA) is focused into the detection zone of the capillary. The back-scattered interference pattern is reflected towards a split photodiode using a beam splitter. Two quadrants of the photodiode are aligned on the fringe pattern, and the differential signal is amplified and recorded as the BSI signal. The same 488 nm laser line also excites fluorescence in the capillary, which is collected from below using a 0.75 NA, 80 × ultralong working distance objective (Olympus ULWD NeoSPlan 80). The collected light is filtered (Chroma 500 nm long pass) to remove residual excitation light and the fluorescence is detected on a single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD, EG&G). The digital output of the SPAD is sent to a counter (National Instruments, USB-6251) and binned in software written in LabVIEW.

Before each separation, the capillary is conditioned for 5 min with 0.1 M NaOH, using an under pressure applied at the capillary outlet to flow the solution. This is followed with 5 min treatments with ultra-pure water and 5 min with the BGE. For all separations reported here, samples are pressure injected for a duration of 150 ms at 65 kPa. Following injection, all samples are separated in normal polarity mode using field strengths ranging from 500 to 700 V/cm (Spellman, CZE 1000R).

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

1. Harris, N. S. & Winter, W. E. Multiple myeloma and related serum protein disorders: an electrophoretic guide. 1st edn, (Demos Medical Pub., Chennai, 2012).

2. O’Connell, T. X., Horita, T. J. & Kasravi, B. Understanding and interpreting serum protein electrophoresis. Am. Fam. Phys. 71, 105–112 (2005).

   Google Scholar 

3. Keren, D. F. Capillary zone electrophoresis in the evaluation of serum protein abnormalities. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 110, 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/110.2.248 (1998).

   Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

4. Bossuyt, X. Advances in serum protein electrophoresis. Adv. Clin. Chem. 42, 43–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2423(06)42002-3 (2006).

   Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

5. Tiselius, A. A new apparatus for electrophoretic analysis of colloidal mixtures. Trans. Faraday Soc. 33, 524–531. https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9373300524 (1937).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

6. Keren, D. F. Protein Electrophoresis in Clinical Diagnosis (American Society for Clinical Pathology Press, 2012).

   Book  Google Scholar 

7. Bossuyt, X. Separation of serum proteins by automated capillary zone electrophoresis. 41, 762-772, doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2003.116 (2003).

8. Thormann, W. et al. Capillary electrophoresis in clinical and forensic analysis: recent advances and breakthrough to routine applications. Electrophoresis 20, 3203–3236. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991001)20:15/16%3c3203::AID-ELPS3203%3e3.0.CO;2-E (1999).

   Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

9. Chartier, C. et al. Evaluation of two automated capillary electrophoresis systems for human serum protein analysis. Clin. Biochem. 44, 1473–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.05.022 (2011).

   Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

10. Jolliff, C. R. & Blessum, C. R. Comparison of serum protein electrophoresis by agarose gel and capillary zone electrophoresis in a clinical setting. Electrophoresis 18, 1781–1784. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150181012 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

11. Lauer, H. H. & McManigill, D. Capillary zone electrophoresis of proteins in untreated fused silica tubing. Anal. Chem. 58, 166–170. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00292a041 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

12. Verzola, B., Gelfi, C. & Righetti, P. G. Protein adsorption to the bare silica wall in capillary electrophoresis: quantitative study on the chemical composition of the background electrolyte for minimising the phenomenon. J. Chromatogr. A 868, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(99)01207-8 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

13. de Jong, S., Epelbaum, N., Liyanage, R. & Krylov, S. N. A semipermanent coating for preventing protein adsorption at physiological pH in kinetic capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 33, 2584–2590. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201200153 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

14. Cong, H. et al. Thermally responsive anti-protein adsorption coated capillary for electrophoretic analysis of proteins. ChemistrySelect 5, 11854–11861. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202002267 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

15. Ng, C. L., Lee, H. K. & Li, S. F. Y. Prevention of protein adsorption on surfaces by polyethylene oxide-polypropylene oxide-polyethylene oxide triblock copolymers in capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. A 659, 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(94)85085-2 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

16. Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Tan, L., Liu, S. & Wang, Y. Assembly of poly(dopamine)/poly(acrylamide) mixed coatings by a single-step surface modification strategy and its application to the separation of proteins using capillary electrophoresis. J. Sep. Sci. 38, 2915–2923. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201500346 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

17. Dawod, M., Arvin, N. E. & Kennedy, R. T. Recent advances in protein analysis by capillary and microchip electrophoresis. Analyst 142, 1847–1866. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7an00198c (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

18. McCudden, C. R. et al. Performance comparison of capillary and agarose gel electrophoresis for the identification and characterization of monoclonal immunoglobulins. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 129, 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1309/6kt8n49brnvvvbt1 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

19. Litwin, C. et al. Comparison of capillary zone and immunosubtraction with agarose gel and immunofixation electrophoresis for detecting and identifying monoclonal gammopathies. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 112, 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/112.3.411 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

20. Wijnen, P. A. & van Dieijen-Visser, M. P. Capillary electrophoresis of serum proteins. Reproducibility, comparison with agarose gel electrophoresis and a review of the literature. Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 34, 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.1996.34.7.535 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

21. Mussap, M. et al. Measurement of serum monoclonal components: comparison between densitometry and capillary zone electrophoresis. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (CCLM) 44, 609–611. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2006.112 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

22. McCudden, C. R. et al. Recognition and management of common, rare, and novel serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation interferences. Clin. Biochem. 51, 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.08.013 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

23. Regeniter, A. & Siede, W. H. Peaks and tails: Evaluation of irregularities in capillary serum protein electrophoresis. Clin. Biochem. 51, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.09.017 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

24. Levitt, D. G. & Levitt, M. D. Human serum albumin homeostasis: a new look at the roles of synthesis, catabolism, renal and gastrointestinal excretion, and the clinical value of serum albumin measurements. Int. J. Gen. Med. 9, 229–255. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S102819 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

25. Tripathy, S. The role of serum protein electrophoresis in the detection of multiple myeloma: an experience of a corporate hospital. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 6, 1458–1461. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/4213.2532 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

26. Alexanian, R., Weber, D. & Liu, F. Differential diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 123, 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-9985(1999)123%3c0108:DDOMG%3e2.0.CO;2 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

27. Schultz, N. M. & Kennedy, R. T. Rapid immunoassays using capillary electrophoresis with fluorescence detection. Anal. Chem. 65, 3161–3165. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00069a035 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

28. Mi, J. Q., Zhang, X. X. & Chang, W. B. Determination of morphine by capillary zone electrophoresis immunoassay combined with laser-induced fluorescence detection. J. Immun. Immunochem. 25, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1081/ias-120027226 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

29. Moser, A. C. & Hage, D. S. Capillary electrophoresis-based immunoassays: principles and quantitative applications. Electrophoresis 29, 3279–3295. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200700871 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

30. Kanoatov, M., Mehrabanfar, S. & Krylov, S. N. Systematic approach to optimization of experimental conditions in nonequilibrium capillary electrophoresis of equilibrium mixtures. Anal. Chem. 88, 9300–9308. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02882 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

31. Galievsky, V. A., Stasheuski, A. S. & Krylov, S. N. Capillary electrophoresis for quantitative studies of biomolecular interactions. Anal. Chem. 87, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac504219r (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

32. Hafner, F. T., Kautz, R. A., Iverson, B. L., Tim, R. C. & Karger, B. L. Noncompetitive immunoassay of small analytes at the femtomolar level by affinity probe capillary electrophoresis: direct analysis of digoxin using a uniform-labeled scFv immunoreagent. Anal. Chem. 72, 5779–5786. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac000853+ (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

33. Shimura, K. & Karger, B. L. Affinity probe capillary electrophoresis: analysis of recombinant human growth hormone with a fluorescent labeled antibody fragment. Anal. Chem. 66, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00073a004 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

34. Krylov, S. N. Nonequilibrium capillary electrophoresis of equilibrium mixtures (NECEEM): a novel method for biomolecular screening. J. Biomol. Screen. 11, 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057105284339 (2005).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

35. Krylov, S. N. & Berezovski, M. Non-equilibrium capillary electrophoresis of equilibrium mixtures—appreciation of kinetics in capillary electrophoresis. Analyst 128, 571–575. https://doi.org/10.1039/B212913B (2003).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

36. Moser, A. C., Trenhaile, S. & Frankenberg, K. Studies of antibody-antigen interactions by capillary electrophoresis: a review. Methods 146, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.03.006 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

37. Grossman, P. D. et al. Application of free-solution capillary electrophoresis to the analytical scale separation of proteins and peptides. Anal. Chem. 61, 1186–1194. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00186a003 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

38. Nielsen, R. G., Rickard, E. C., Santa, P. F., Sharknas, D. A. & Sittampalam, G. S. Separation of antibody-antigen complexes by capillary zone electrophoresis, isoelectric focusing and high-performance size-exclusion chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 539, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(01)95371-3 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

39. Chen, F. T. & Sternberg, J. C. Characterization of proteins by capillary electrophoresis in fused-silica columns: review on serum protein analysis and application to immunoassays. Electrophoresis 15, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150150104 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

40. Chen, F. T. & Evangelista, R. A. Feasibility studies for simultaneous immunochemical multianalyte drug assay by capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence. Clin. Chem. 40, 1819–1822 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

41. Tao, L. & Kennedy, R. T. Measurement of antibody-antigen dissociation constants using fast capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. Electrophoresis 18, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150180121 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

42. Lin, S. & Hsu, S.-M. Determination of the association constant for slow phosphoserine-anti-phosphoserine interaction kinetics by capillary zone electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 18, 2042–2046. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150181127 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

43. Caslavska, J., Allemann, D. & Thormann, W. Analysis of urinary drugs of abuse by a multianalyte capillary electrophoretic immunoassay. J. Chromatogr. A 838, 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00115-6 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

44. Chiem, N. H. & Harrison, D. J. Microchip systems for immunoassay: an integrated immunoreactor with electrophoretic separation for serum theophylline determination. Clin. Chem. 44, 591–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/44.3.591 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

45. Schmalzing, D. et al. Capillary electrophoresis-based immunoassay for cortisol in serum. Anal. Chem. 67, 606–612. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00099a019 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

46. Schmalzing, D., Nashabeh, W. & Fuchs, M. Solution-phase immunoassay for determination of cortisol in serum by capillary electrophoresis. Clin. Chem. 41, 1403–1406. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/41.9.1403 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

47. Chen, F. T. & Pentoney, S. L. Jr. Characterization of digoxigenin-labeled B-phycoerythrin by capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence. Application to homogeneous digoxin immunoassay. J. Chromatogr. A 680, 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(94)85139-5 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

48. Harrison, D. J., Manz, A., Fan, Z., Luedi, H. & Widmer, H. M. Capillary electrophoresis and sample injection systems integrated on a planar glass chip. Anal. Chem. 64, 1926–1932. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00041a030 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

49. Ye, L., Le, X. C., Xing, J. Z., Ma, M. & Yatscoff, R. Competitive immunoassay for cyclosporine using capillary electrophoresis with laser induced fluorescence polarization detection. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 714, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4347(98)00091-7 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

50. Schultz, N. M., Huang, L. & Kennedy, R. T. Capillary electrophoresis-based immunoassay to determine insulin content and insulin secretion from single islets of Langerhans. Anal. Chem. 67, 924–929. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00101a020 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

51. Schmalzing, D., Koutny, L. B., Taylor, T. A., Nashabeh, W. & Fuchs, M. Immunoassay for thyroxine (T4) in serum using capillary electrophoresis and micromachined devices. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 697, 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4347(97)00256-9 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

52. Tao, L., Aspinwall, C. A. & Kennedy, R. T. On-line competitive immunoassay based on capillary electrophoresis applied to monitoring insulin secretion from single islets of Langerhans. Electrophoresis 19, 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150190307 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

53. German, I. & Kennedy, R. T. Rapid simultaneous determination of glucagon and insulin by capillary electrophoresis immunoassays. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 742, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4347(00)00180-8 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

54. Okun, V. M., Moser, R., Blaas, D. & Kenndler, E. Complexes between monoclonal antibodies and receptor fragments with a common cold virus: determination of stoichiometry by capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Chem. 73, 3900–3906. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0102213 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

55. Okun, V. M., Ronacher, B., Blaas, D. & Kenndler, E. Affinity capillary electrophoresis for the assessment of complex formation between viruses and monoclonal antibodies. Anal. Chem. 72, 4634–4639. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac000250y (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

56. Halewyck, H. et al. Affinity capillary electrophoresis to evaluate the complex formation between poliovirus and nanobodies. J. Sep. Sci. 37, 3729–3737. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201400406 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

57. Kremser, L., Petsch, M., Blaas, D. & Kenndler, E. Capillary electrophoresis of affinity complexes between subviral 80S particles of human rhinovirus and monoclonal antibody 2G2. Electrophoresis 27, 2630–2637. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200600066 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

58. Heegaard, N. H. H. & Kennedy, R. T. Antigen–antibody interactions in capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. B 768, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00489-3 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

59. Reif, O.-W., Lausch, R., Scheper, T. & Freitag, R. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled protein G as an affinity ligand in affinity/immunocapillary electrophoresis with fluorescence detection. Anal. Chem. 66, 4027–4033. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00094a027 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

60. Wang, Z. L., Swinney, K. & Bornhop, D. J. Attomole sensitivity for unlabeled proteins and polypeptides with on-chip capillary electrophoresis and universal detection by interferometric backscatter. Electrophoresis 24, 865–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200390109 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

61. Dunn, R. C. Compact, inexpensive refractive index detection in femtoliter volumes using commercial optical pickup technology. Anal. Methods 11, 2303–2310. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9AY00369J (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

62. Bushey, M. M. & Jorgenson, J. W. Capillary electrophoresis of proteins in buffers containing high concentrations of zwitterionic salts. J. Chromatogr. A 480, 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)84299-0 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

63. Katayama, H., Ishihama, Y. & Asakawa, N. Stable cationic capillary coating with successive multiple ionic polymer layers for capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Chem. 70, 5272–5277. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac980522l (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

64. Ghosal, S. Fluid mechanics of electroosmotic flow and its effect on band broadening in capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 25, 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200305745 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

65. Ghosal, S. Electrokinetic flow and dispersion in capillary electrophoresis. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092053 (2006).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

66. Leclercq, L., Renard, C., Martin, M. & Cottet, H. Quantification of adsorption and optimization of separation of proteins in capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Chem. 92, 10743–10750. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02012 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

67. Gordon, M. J., Lee, K. J., Arias, A. A. & Zare, R. N. Protocol for resolving protein mixtures in capillary zone electrophoresis. Anal. Chem. 63, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00001a012 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

68. Stover, F. S., Haymore, B. L. & McBeath, R. J. Capillary zone electrophoresis of histidine-containing compounds. J. Chromatogr. 470, 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(00)94217-1 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

69. Albarghouthi, M. N., Stein, T. M. & Barron, A. E. Poly-N-hydroxyethylacrylamide as a novel, adsorbed coating for protein separation by capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 24, 1166–1175. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200390150 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

70. Ahmadzadeh, H., Dovichi, N. J. & Krylov, S. Capillary coating for protein separation based on Si-O and Si-C covalent bond formation for capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. Methods Mol. Biol. 276, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-798-x:015 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

71. Schure, M. R. & Lenhoff, A. M. Consequences of wall adsorption in capillary electrophoresis: theory and simulation. Anal. Chem. 65, 3024–3037. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00069a015 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

72. Ghosal, S. Effect of analyte adsorption on the electroosmotic flow in microfluidic channels. Anal. Chem. 74, 771–775. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac010571p (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

73. Ermakov, S. V., Zhukov, M. Y., Capelli, L. & Righetti, P. G. Wall adsorption in capillary electrophoresis experimental study and computer simulation. J. Chromatogr. A 699, 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(94)01228-7 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

74. De Silva, M., Opallage, P. M. & Dunn, R. C. Direct detection of inorganic ions and underivatized amino acids in seconds using high-speed capillary electrophoresis coupled with back-scatter interferometry. Anal. Methods https://doi.org/10.1039/D0AY02218G (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge support from the University of Kansas. P.M.O. and M.D.S. gratefully acknowledge support from the Marsi Summer Scholars program and the Univeristy of Kansas.

Author information

Author notes

1. These authors contributed equally: Prabhavie M. Opallage and Miyuru De Silva.

Authors and Affiliations

1. Ralph N. Adams Institute for Bioanalytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, KS, 66047, USA

   Prabhavie M. Opallage, Miyuru De Silva & Robert C. Dunn

Authors

1. Prabhavie M. Opallage

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

2. Miyuru De Silva

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

3. Robert C. Dunn

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.M.O. and M.D.S. both contributed equally to this study under the direction of R.C.D. P.M.O., M.D.S, and R.C.D designed the experiments and P.M.O. and M.D.S. carried out the experiements and analyzed the results together. P.M.O. and M.D.S wrote the first draft of the manuscript and created the first draft of the figures. R.C.D. edited the manuscript and figures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert C. Dunn.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Opallage, P.M., De Silva, M. & Dunn, R.C. Dual detection high-speed capillary electrophoresis for simultaneous serum protein analysis and immunoassays. Sci Rep 12, 1951 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05956-8

Download citation

• Received: 27 September 2021

• Accepted: 17 January 2022

• Published: 04 February 2022

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05956-8

How many bands are seen in serum protein electrophoresis?

What is a normal serum protein electrophoresis?

What is electrophoresis and the protein bands in serum electrophoresis?

What is serum protein electrophoresis what is it used for what does it show?