What are the 4 pricing orientations?
What is a Sales-Oriented Pricing Strategy?A sales oriented pricing strategy is where you set our product price based on a particular sales target or sales goal. Sometimes, it could be about units sold. So, we might say we want to sell 10 million units. In order to do that, we think we need to set this price here. That's one way to go. Another way to go would be to target a certain market share. We can approach our price setting to try to hit that goal. Show In general, when we take a sales oriented pricing strategy, it tends to put downward pressure on our price. So, we have to make sure we don't go so low as to fail to cover our costs. But, if we really want to increase sales, generally that means setting a price a little lower. In any case, if our pricing strategy is based on sales or a certain sales target, what we are using is called a sales oriented pricing strategy.
Related Topics
Recommended textbook solutions
Fundamentals of Engineering Economic Analysis1st EditionDavid Besanko, Mark Shanley, Scott Schaefer 215 solutions
 Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics15th EditionDouglas A. Lind, Samuel A. Wathen, William G. Marchal 1,236 solutions
Essentials of Investments9th EditionAlan J. Marcus, Alex Kane, Zvi Bodie 689 solutions Principles of Economics8th EditionN. Gregory Mankiw 1,335 solutions Brownlie, D. and J. Spender. 1995. “Managerial Judgement in Strategic Marketing.” Management Decision 33 (6): 39–50. CrossRef Google Scholar Burke, L.A. and M. K. Miller. 1999. “Taking the Mystery Out of Intuitive Decision Making.” The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005) 13 (4): 91–99. Google Scholar Cohen, W. and D. Lcvinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–152. CrossRef Google Scholar Corbin, J. and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Inc. Google Scholar Cressman, Jr., G. 1999. “Commentary on Industrial Pricing: Theory and Managerial Practice.” Marketing Science: 455–57. Google Scholar Cressman, Jr., G. 2010. “Selling Value-Based Pricing Strategies: Making Pricing Strategy Work.” The Journal of Professional Pricing (First Quarter 2010): 16–19. Google Scholar Cyert, R. and J. March. 1992. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar Daft, R. and K. Weick. 1984. “Toward a Model of Organizations As Interpretation Systems.” The Academy of Management Review 9 (2): 284–95. CrossRef Google Scholar Dane, E. and M. G. Pratt. 2007. “Exploring Intuition and Its Role in Managerial Decision Making.” Academy of Management Review 32 (1): 33–54. CrossRef Google Scholar Deaker, J. and X. Zang. 2006. “How to Organize the Pricing Discipline.” The Pricing Advisor Nov. 2006: 1–4. Google Scholar Dolan, R and H. Simon. 1996. Power Pricing: How Managing Price Transforms the Bottom Line. Free Press. Google Scholar Duncan, R 1972. “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (3): 313–27. CrossRef Google Scholar Dutta, S., M. J. Zbaracki and M. Bergen. 2003. “Pricing Process as a Capability: A Resource-Based Perspective.” Strategic Management Journal 24 (7): 615. CrossRef Google Scholar Forbis, J. and N. Mehta. 1981. “Value-Based Strategies for Industrial Products.” Business Horizons 24 (3): 32–42. CrossRef Google Scholar Fredrickson, J. 1986. “The Strategic Decision Process and Organizational Structure.” Academy of Management Review 11 (2): 280–97. CrossRef Google Scholar Glaser, B. and A. Strauss. 1977. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. Google Scholar Green, S. and T. Taber. 1978. “Structuring Experiential Learning Through Experimentation.” The Academy of Management Review 3 (4): 889–95. CrossRef Google Scholar Hage, J. and M Aiken. 1967. “Relationship of Centralization to qther Structural Properties.” Administrative Science Quarterly 12 (1): 72–92. CrossRef Google Scholar Hage, J. and M. Aiken. 1970. Social Change in Complex Organizations. New York: Random House. Google Scholar Hall, R. 1977. Organization, Structure, and Process, (Vol. 2). London: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar Hall, R., N. Johnson and J. E. Haas. 1967. “Organizational Size, Complexity, and Formalization.” American Sociological Review 32 (6): 903–12. CrossRef Google Scholar Hinterhuber, A. 2004. “Towards Value-Based Pricing: An Integrative Framework for Decision Making.” Industrial Marketing Management 33 (8): 765–78. CrossRef Google Scholar Hinterhuber, A. 2008. “Value Delivery and Value-Based Pricing in Industrial Markets.” Advances in Business Marketing and Purchasing 14: 381–448. CrossRef Google Scholar Ingenbleek, P. 2007. “Value-Informed Pricing in Its Organizational Context: Literature Review, Conceptual Framework, and Directions for Future Research.” Journal of Product & Brand Management 16 (7): 441–58. CrossRef Google Scholar John, G. and J. Martin. 1984. “Effects of Organizational Structure ofMarketing Planning on Credibility and Utilization of Plan Output.” Journal of Marketing Research 21 (2): 170–83. CrossRef Google Scholar Khatri, N. and H. A. Ng. 2000. “The Role of Intuition in Strategic Decision Making.” Human Relations 53 (1): 57. CrossRef Google Scholar Kolb, D. 1984. Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar Langer, E. 1997. The Power of Mindful Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar Lawrence, P. and J. Lorsh. 1967. Organization and Enviroment. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School Google Scholar Malhotra, N. K. 1996. “The Impact of the Academy of Marketing Science on Marketing Scholarship: An Analysis of the Research Published in JAMS.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24 (4): 291. CrossRef Google Scholar March, J. 1994. A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. Free Press. Google Scholar Maxwell, J. 2005. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, (Vol. 42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Google Scholar Mezirow, J. 1996. “Contemporary Paradigms ofLearning.” Adult Education Quarterly 46 (3): 158. CrossRef Google Scholar Mezirow, J. 1997. “Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice.” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 1997(74): 5–12. CrossRef Google Scholar Mezirow, J. 2000. Learning to Think Like an Adult. Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress: 3–33. Google Scholar Mezirow, J. and M. Welton. 1995. In Defense of the Lifeworld. State University of NewYork Press New York. Google Scholar Miller, D. 1987. “Strategy Making and Structure: Analysis and Implications for Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 30 (1): 7–32. Google Scholar Nagle, T. and R. Holden. 2002. The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing: A Guide to Profitable Decision Making. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar Noble, P. and T. Gruca. 1999a. “Industrial Pricing: Theory and Managerial Practice.” Marketing Science 18 (3): 435–454. CrossRef Google Scholar Pfeffer, J. 1978. “The Micropolitics of Organizations.” In Environments and Organizations, pp. 29–50. Ed. M. W. Meyer. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar Pfeffer, J. and R. Sutton. 2006. “Evidence-Based Management.” HafliJard Business Review 84 (1): 62. Google Scholar Pugh, D., D. Hickson, C. R. Hinings, K. M. Macdonald, C. Turner and T. Lupton. 1963. “A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis.” Administrative Science Quarterly 8 (3): 289–315. CrossRef Google Scholar Sadler-Smith, E. and E. Shefy. 2004. “The Intuitive Executive: Understanding and Applying’ gut Feel’in Decision-Making.” The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005) 18 (4): 76–91. Google Scholar Shipley, D. and E. Bourdon. 1990. “Distributor Pricing in Very Competitive Markets.” Industrial Marketing Management 19(4): 215–224. CrossRef Google Scholar Simon, H. A. 1961. Administrative Behavior. New York: Mac Millan. Google Scholar Simon, H. A. 1987. “Making Management Decisions: The Role ofintuition and Emotion.” The Academy of Management Executive (1987–1989) 1 (1): 57–64. Google Scholar Slater, S. 1997. “Developing a Customer Value-Based Theory of the Firm.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (2): 162–67. CrossRef Google Scholar Smith, G. 1995. “Managerial Pricing Orientation: The Process of Making Pricing Decisions.” Pricing Strategy & Practice 3 (3): 28–39. Google Scholar Spender, J. 1989. Industry Recipes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar Stein, E. 1995. “Organization Memory: Review of Concepts and Recommendations for Management.” International Journal of Information Management 15 (1): 17–32. CrossRef Google Scholar Szulanski, G. 1996. “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm.” Strategic Management Journal 17: 27–43. CrossRef Google Scholar Taylor, E. 2007. “An Update ofTransformative Learning Theory: A Critical Review of the Empirical Research (1999– 2005).” International Journal of Lifelong Education 26 (2): 173–91. CrossRef Google Scholar Thomke, S. 2003. Experimentation Matters. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar Van De Yen, A. and D. Ferry. 1980. Measuring and Assessing Organizations. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar What are the 4 types of pricing?What are the 4 major pricing strategies? Value-based, competition-based, cost-plus, and dynamic pricing are all models that are used frequently, depending on the industry and business model in question.
What are the 4 pricing policies?Choosing the right pricing strategy. Cost-plus pricing. Many businesspeople and consumers think that cost-plus pricing, or mark-up pricing, is the only way to price. ... . Competitive pricing. ... . Price skimming. ... . Penetration pricing. ... . Value-based pricing.. What are the 4 steps to pricing strategy?Remember, setting prices isn't an exact science.. Do your research. ... . Test the market. ... . Offer different price points. ... . Explore different pricing models.. What is price orientation?Updated on 09/19/19. Competition-oriented pricing, also known as market-oriented pricing, means basing the prices of your products or services on those of the competition rather than considering consumer demand and your own costs. This pricing method also involves analyzing and researching your target market.
|
