What are the five groups categorized by Rogers in his diffusion of innovation theory?

Back to Rogers’ research, we see that not everyone will immediately adopt a disruptive idea despite obvious benefits. Over years of research, Rogers identified some fascinating personality traits that help us organize how people will accept a new innovation. It turns out we approach innovations in the following ways.

(From Diffusion of Innovations)

Innovators (2.5%) – Innovators are the first individuals to adopt an innovation. Innovators are willing to take risks, youngest in age, have the highest social class, have great financial lucidity, very social and have closest contact to scientific sources and interaction with other innovators. Risk tolerance has them adopting technologies which may ultimately fail. Financial resources help absorb these failures. (Rogers 1962 5th ed, p. 282)

Early Adopters (13.5%) – This is the second fastest category of individuals who adopt an innovation. These individuals have the highest degree of opinion leadership among the other adopter categories. Early adopters are typically younger in age, have a higher social status, have more financial lucidity, advanced education, and are more socially forward than late adopters. More discrete in adoption choices than innovators. Realize judicious choice of adoption will help them maintain central communication position (Rogers 1962 5th ed, p. 283).

Early Majority (34%) – Individuals in this category adopt an innovation after a varying degree of time. This time of adoption is significantly longer than the innovators and early adopters. Early Majority tend to be slower in the adoption process, have above average social status, contact with early adopters, and seldom hold positions of opinion leadership in a system (Rogers 1962 5th ed, p. 283)

Late Majority (34%) – Individuals in this category will adopt an innovation after the average member of the society. These individuals approach an innovation with a high degree of skepticism and after the majority of society has adopted the innovation. Late Majority are typically skeptical about an innovation, have below average social status, very little financial lucidity, in contact with others in late majority and early majority, very little opinion leadership.

Laggards (16%) – Individuals in this category are the last to adopt an innovation. Unlike some of the previous categories, individuals in this category show little to no opinion leadership. These individuals typically have an aversion to change-agents and tend to be advanced in age. Laggards typically tend to be focused on “traditions”, likely to have lowest social status, lowest financial fluidity, be oldest of all other adopters, in contact with only family and close friends, very little to no opinion leadership.

If we were to graph these groups, we’d see the standard bell shape curve:

What are the five groups categorized by Rogers in his diffusion of innovation theory?

Where blue represents the groups of consumer adopting a new technology and yellow is the market share which obviously reaches 100% following complete adoption. This is the point of market saturation.

Which One Are You?

It is important to note that individuals do not always line up as “Innovators” in all areas of their decision making processes. For example, a person may adopt cutting-edge green technologies for their home with solar heating and yet not belong to an online social network or own a smartphone. We bounce back and forth across the curve in large part based on the pain points we are trying to solve and our interest in the underpinnings of the change presented.

Bonus: While this research can seem a bit high-level, it has profound real-world impacts on how technology products and services get adopted. Many entrepreneurs and marketers fail to take into account that you must move from left to right in the adoption curve. As a result, they drastically overestimate their market size and how much work and time will go into getting a disruptive idea into the mainstream. For a detailed must-read in this area that builds on Rogers’ research with real-world examples from the tech space, check out Crossing the Chasm by Geoffrey Moore.

What is diffusion of innovation?

What are the five groups categorized by Rogers in his diffusion of innovation theory?

The diffusion of innovation theory is a concept that explains how innovations are perceived by society and according to what regularities their distribution can be accelerated. It was created by the sociologist Everett Rogers about 60 years ago and became known to society after the publication of “Diffusion of Innovation.”  The book examined the diffusion of innovations through the example of agriculture. Rogers found that some farmers were actively engaged in learning and using innovation, while some even resisted replacing equally efficient farming practices.

The diffusion of innovation theory appealed to 20th-century scientists. For example, it can be found in the work of the geographer Torsten Hägerstrand and the mathematician Frank Bass. Thus, the diffusion of innovation process was the basis for modelling geographical phenomena and creating a system of mathematical functions that determine the sales dynamics of a product new to the market. The Bass model (or “Bass curve”) showed that sales of an unfamiliar product increased over time. It prevented the closure of many unprofitable product lines.

The diffusion of innovation theory

What are the five groups categorized by Rogers in his diffusion of innovation theory?

The main components of Rogers’ theory are:

  • Innovation. It is the concept describing any ideas and technologies that are new to users.
  • Users. They are the audience that embraces innovation.
  • The critical mass of users. It is a sufficient number of people who actively use the innovations to initiate their widespread adoption.
  • The process of innovation adoption. It’s a process consisting of five steps that leads to the acceptance or rejection of mass use of a new idea/technology.
  • Additional key factors. These are factors that play a role in the process of innovation adoption. Rogers considered them to be communication, the social system, and time.

Rogers suggests dividing users or potential customers into five segments:

  • Innovators. No more than 2.5%;
  • Early adopters. No more than 13.5%;
  • Early majority. No more than 34%;
  • Late majority. No more than 34%;
  • Latecomers. No more than 16%.

This division shows that at the very beginning of an innovation’s life cycle, an absolute minority of potential consumers start using it outside the laboratory or company where it was created. The speed of adoption of innovation depends entirely on the reach of the innovation. The receptivity of the audience to the innovation, in turn, is directly correlated with the pace of its spread.

Decisions made by users within the diffusion of innovation theory get divided into voluntary, collective, and authoritative. One person makes voluntary decisions, a group of people make collective decisions, and users who have power over a particular social group make authoritative decisions.

The diffusion of innovation process

What are the five groups categorized by Rogers in his diffusion of innovation theory?

The diffusion of innovation occurs as the gradual introduction of innovation into the lives of consumers. Everett Rogers believed that it could be used in all marketing communication and projected onto social institutions and science.

Stages of diffusion of innovation:

  • Step 1: Awareness. Understand this step as increasing awareness of the product or service among the target audience in marketing terms. In other words, you spread the word about the innovation using standard marketing tools.
  • Step 2: Persuasion. A story about an innovation and any advertising message about an innovation demonstrates your offer’s benefits and advantages. It is important to explain how the product differs from the solutions familiar to the user and warm up the consumer’s interest in it at the persuasion stage.
  • Step 3: The Solution. It is the name of the active involvement of the user in the research of innovation and its consumption. The potential customer evaluates your innovation, trying to understand how it fits their goals and needs. Use a standard sales funnel but unconventional for your field lead magnets. For example, instead of offering a webinar as a gift for a subscription (lead-magnet), you can offer a month of lectures for a small fee (tripwire).
  • Step 4: Implementation. It is the regular use of innovation or some form of it by consumers. The consumer tests the product, beginning to understand it, and after a while cannot imagine their life without your innovation. To earn the customer’s loyalty and make them an “advocate” of your innovation, it is vital to keep service at a high level, not to raise the cost of the innovation beyond the reach of your target audience, and to create a unique community that is accessible only to your customers.
  • Step 5: Confirmation. The consumer consciously decides to use the innovation in the future, preferring it to all your competitors. Step 5 is characterised by an increase in the number of customers actively using your innovation and the spread of positive recommendations from early adopters.

Will my product make it through diffusion of innovation?

The diffusion potential of innovation is determined by taking a simple test. Is your product new to the market? Do you believe the audience won’t understand it after first encountering it? Will you be promoting your product using marketing tools? If you answered positively to all three questions, then the diffusion of innovation theory can be applied to your case. Have you answered “no” to one of the questions? Rogers’ message can form the basis for a successful marketing strategy.

Examples of diffusion of innovation

What are the five groups categorized by Rogers in his diffusion of innovation theory?

The most common diffusion of innovation example is introducing a new gadget (iPhone, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip), a machine or technology (personal computer, Microsoft), or industrial material to the market. The theory also applies to the emergence of new material incentives on the labour market (a division of wages into salary, KPI bonuses, and percentage of sales), forms of the company organisation, bills, and executive orders. According to this theory, innovations are most often either technical or organisational. However, the possibility of diffusion of organisational innovations gets limited by the high degree of formalisation of innovations. In practice, this means that mainly new products of the technological spectrum go through the diffusion of innovation “funnel”.

A new idea can also be considered diffusion of innovation if it passes through the stages described above and is new to the market. A new product that occupies a niche not previously filled by manufacturers present on the market can also pass through the diffusion of innovation “funnel” on its way to the consumer.

What are the 5 categories of Everett Rogers diffusion of innovations?

In a series of diffusion studies across multiple areas, Rogers found that innovations that have these 5 characteristics -high relative advantage, trialability, observability, and compatibility, and low complexity- are likely to succeed over innovations that do not.

What are the stages of Rogers diffusion of innovation theory?

For Rogers (2003), the innovation-decision process involves five steps: (1) knowledge, (2) persuasion, (3) decision, (4) implementation, and (5) confirmation. These stages typically follow each other in a time-ordered manner.

What are the 5 categories of adopters?

The 5 adopter categories, in order of their speed of uptake, are:.
Innovators..
Early Adopters..
Early Majority..
Late Majority..
Laggards..

What are the five factors given in Rogers framework for easy diffusion?

Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Theory [5] seeks to explain how new ideas or innovations (such as the HHK) are adopted, and this theory proposes that there are five attributes of an innovation that effect adoption: (1) relative advantage, (2) compatibility, (3) complexity, (4) trialability, and (5), observability.