Chúng tôi so sánh hai GPU Nền tảng di động: 8GB VRAM Arc A570M và 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520M để xem GPU nào có hiệu suất tốt hơn trong các thông số kỹ thuật chính, kiểm tra đánh giá, tiêu thụ điện năng, v.v.
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores9696Core clock speed810 MHz625 MHzNumber of transistors585 million585 millionManufacturing process technology40 nm28 nmPower consumption [TDP]65 Watt25 WattTexture fill rate12.9610.00Floating-point performance311.0 gflops258.0 gflops
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce GT 630 and NVS 5200M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus [motherboard compatibility], additional power connectors [power supply compatibility]. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop sizeno datamedium sizedInterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXMLength145 mmno dataWidth1-slotno dataSupplementary power connectorsNoneno data
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory typeDDR3DDR3Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GBMemory bus width128 Bit64 BitMemory clock speed1800 MHz1800 MHzMemory bandwidth28.8 GB/s14.4 GB/sShared memoryno data-
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones [so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips]. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputsHDMI+no data
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX12 [11_0]12 [11_0]Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.64.6OpenCL1.11.1VulkanN/AN/ACUDA2.1+
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GT 630 outperforms NVS 5200M by 33% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 [the last being done in 4K resolution if possible], and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GeForce GT 630 outperforms NVS 5200M by 32% in Passmark.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GeForce GT 630 outperforms NVS 5200M by 15% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
GeForce GT 630 outperforms NVS 5200M by 9% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GT 630 and NVS 5200M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC [SHA256] 20 Mh/s 17 Mh/s
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD14−16 11
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score 1.75 1.32 Memory bus width 128 64 Memory bandwidth 28.8 14.4 Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm Power consumption [TDP] 65 Watt 25 Watt
The GeForce GT 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 5200M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GT 630 is a desktop card while NVS 5200M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your own vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.
GeForce GT 630
NVS 5200M
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User ratings: view and submit
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:
Rate NVIDIA NVS 5200M on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.