In the landmark case of lincoln mills, the supreme court ordered that ________.

1. Describe how the legal foundation for arbitration as it exists today in the United States was developed. The first mention of labor arbitration in American labor history dates to a clause in the constitution of the journey men Cabinet Makers of Philadelphia in 1829. The earliest arbitration hearing was in 1865 when ironworkers in Pittsburg arbitrated their wages. The first known case for using outside arbitrator was in 1871 in eastern Ohio. The Lincoln Mills Case is considered a landmark decision in arbitration. In this case Supreme Court ordered an employer to arbitrate grievances as provided for in a collective bargaining agreement that stated an employer’s agreement to arbitrate grievance disputes was a tradeoff for unions agreement…show more content…
Discuss the five principles that govern the arbitration of grievances under collective bargaining. The process of arbitration was governed by five principles: • Arbitration is matter of contract. These parties are not required to arbitrate a dispute that they have not agreed to submit to arbitration. The court determines whether there is a duty to arbitrate a dispute. • In determining whether there is a duty to arbitrate a dispute, the courts should not examine the merits of the underlying grievance, even if it appears to be frivolous. • In labor contracts with an arbitration clause, arbitrability is presumed unless there is positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible to an interpretation that covers the dispute. Doubts should be resolve in favor of coverage. • As long as an arbitration award is based on the bargaining agreement, a court should enforce the award without examination. • In interpreting the labor agreement, the arbitrator is not limited to the words of the contract. The arbitrator can consider factors such as past practice, parole evidence and common law of the shop. (p.436) 3. Explain how the change of ownership of a company affects the duty to…show more content…
What is the process normally utilized in the selection of an arbitrator? Both labor and management pay arbitrator fees and have the ability to select who the arbitrator will be. The arbitrator is expected to provide a service and meet certain professional standards. They are there to decide disputes arising during the life of the collective bargaining agreement which allows them to learn, be familiar with the history and understand their reasoning. Permanent arbitration can help provide a stable union-management relationship, immediate assistance and are able to resolve disputes faster than in court. The arbitrator has to follow the contract language regardless of their opinion as long as the provision is clear. If the contract language is not clear and disputes arise an arbitrator is guided by basic contract interpretation principles derived from common law of contracts: 1. Honor intent of the parties 2. Interpret the agreement as a whole. 3. Give effect to all terms of the agreement 4. Give undefined terms reasonable definitions 5. Avoid absurd results by considering reasoning and equity. If a permanent arbitrator is not designated in the contract, then an impartial agency is agreed on.

Annotation

Primary Holding

For labor disputes involving federal rights, federal courts are free to construct a federal law that governs labor contracts.

Facts

Textile Workers Union had a collective bargaining agreement with Lincoln Mills, which provided that arbitration would be used to resolve disputes regarding their relationship. It sued in federal court under Section 301(a) of the Taft-Hartley Act to compel Lincoln Mills to submit to arbitration. This law allows federal courts to hear cases based on violations of labor-management agreements that affect interstate commerce. Lincoln Mills argued that Congress had acted unconstitutionality in making this grant of jurisdiction.

Opinions

Majority

  • William Orville Douglas (Author)
  • Earl Warren
  • Hugo Lafayette Black
  • Tom C. Clark
  • William Joseph Brennan, Jr.
  • Charles Evans Whittaker

This grant of jurisdiction is constitutional because it is limited to cases that arise under federal common law, which by definition is federal law.

Concurrence

  • Harold Hitz Burton (Author)
  • John Marshall Harlan II

Cases brought under this law do not rely on federal law as the substantive law that they apply. Enforcing the law involves some federal rights, however, so it is constitutional as part of a congressional grant of protective jurisdiction to federal courts.

Dissent

  • Felix Frankfurter (Author)

Article III does not support the protective jurisdiction theory, which would allow Congress to give federal courts jurisdiction over applications of state laws and state court precedents. This is not a true form of federal question jurisdiction, especially since taking this theory to its conclusion would result in federal courts hearing contract and tort cases if they relate to contracts that affect commerce. Article III does not allow federal courts to create a federal common law that controls collective bargaining agreements, merely on the basis that Congress provides them with this authority under a federal law. The possibility that federal courts may eventually have appellate jurisdiction over a case does not mean that they should have original jurisdiction over it.

Case Commentary

This decision illustrates how a grant of jurisdiction to the federal courts enables them to create new forms of substantive law. Even though this applies only in cases governed by federal questions, rather than diversity cases, it is historically significant.

What arbitration means?

Arbitration is a procedure in which a dispute is submitted, by agreement of the parties, to one or more arbitrators who make a binding decision on the dispute. In choosing arbitration, the parties opt for a private dispute resolution procedure instead of going to court.

Which of the following is an advantage of the process of arbitration quizlet?

Which of the following is an advantage of arbitration over the litigation process? Both labor and management participate in the selection of the arbitrator.

Which of the following is a difference between interest arbitration and rights arbitration?

Most interest arbitration in the United States occurs in the private sector, under compulsory statutes. Rights arbitration deals with the interpretation or application of current contract terms.

During which of the following steps is a grievance said to have moved from the formal to informal stage?

During which of the following steps is a grievance said to have moved from the formal to informal stage? An employee completes a grievance form.